Live Audio

listen to live radio

our own archive

you tell us nai

Uncensored

stuff the paper won't write

Guestbook

go ahead. signs it.

Contact Us

email addresses


click to go back

uncensored: by leo babauta

Any criticism of the current world order, the "booming" U.S. economy, and American consumerism is usually met with an argument along the lines of, "People are happy with the way things are, so what's the problem? Are you going to tell people what they should like?" The mass media are filled with stories about how great things are in the United States, the "new" and "prosperous" economy, and how everyone should be thankful they're better off than they were before.

However, there's the obvious question of whether the 13-year-old sweatshop workers, or the millions of homeless people, or the millions of prisoners, or those trapped in ghettoes, or those without basic sanitation, are happy with the prosperous American economy. And perhaps less obvious is the question of the happiness of the middle-class office worker, trapped in a job where he's subservient to bureaucratic management just to support a lifestyle of a nice house, nice cars, nice material things, and a huge debt -- none of which make him happy. There's also the question of whether the average person is happy with a system where he's powerless against gigantic corporations that not only control the government, but their everyday workplaces.

In this column, I'll list a number of indicators that perhaps many people aren't happy with the way things are and the way corporations control our lives. Next week, I'll write about why many of the consumer-based and election-based movements to reform the current system (such as some of the movements listed below) just cannot accomplish what they hope to accomplish.

Here are a few indicators of dissatisfaction with the new world order:

* Polls of Americans show that people are happy with their lives and jobs, but they also show that this happiness is due to lowered expectations on the part of most Americans. This second fact is less widely reported. The lowered expectations of many Americans is not surprising, given the next couple of items.

* Real wages of many workers (adjusted for inflation) has actually been dropping over the last couple of decades, while fewer workers are insured and while workers are working longer hours. The top fifth of Americans are earning 43 percent more than in 1977. The bottom fifth are earning nine percent less. The richest one percent of workers is earning 115 percent more. Because of inflation, workers earning minimum wage have 20 percent less buying power they had 20 years ago. If average worker pay had risen at the same rate as CEO pay in the last ten years, worker pay would be $110,399. Instead, it is $29,267.

* Both the income gap and the wealth gap between the upper class and the lower class have been growing during the "booming" and "prosperous" new economy. Working households in the middle of the economic scale have lost 11 percent of their net worth since 1983. In the same period, lower-middle-class and poor families -- the 40 percent at the bottom of the economic scale -- lost 80 percent of their net worth. The top one percent increased their net worth by 17 percent. At the same time, the rich have grown wealthier: The richest one percent of households now control 40 percent of the nation's assets, twice what they had 20 years ago.

* Two million people are in jail in America (by far the largest percentage of any country's population in jail), which along with police brutality, prison slave labor, and the death penalty, has drawn large civil rights and human rights protests and campaigns.

* Millions of people have voluntarily simplified their lives, rejecting consumerism and American materialism in favor of a less-hectic, less-costly lifestyle. This very visible trend of the 1990s spread like wildfire when people realized that they have been unwittingly making trade-offs of wage slavery and unhappiness in return for material goods and consumer entertainment that haven't brought happiness. I highly recommend the books "Living the Simple Life" by Elaine St. James and "Your Money or Your Life" by Joe Dominguez and Vicki Robin.

* Anti-globalism and anti-capitalism protests have been waged against the World Trade Organization, World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and World Economic Forum in Seattle last year, and in Washington D.C., Sydney, and Prague this year. Protesters call for either reform or elimination of the powerful system of global corporate dominance that hurts all workers (in the U.S. and worldwide) and the environment.

* Protests have been launched this year against the Democratic National Party and the Republic National Party conventions in Los Angeles and Philadephia, respectively, and the corporate wealth that has bought out the major parties. Protesters point out that there isn't any major difference between the two major parties or their candidates -- they both represent (and are funded by) the rich and the corporations.

* Ralph Nader, the Green Party, and many people are campaigning against the corporate power that controls the government and our lives at the expense of poor people, education, health care, and the general public interest.

* The Global Anti-McDonald's Campaign and the 16th Annual World Anti-McDonald's Day on October 16, 2000, target the symbol of American capitalism and consumerism. The Anti-McDonald's Day is a "protest against the promotion of junk food, the unethical targeting of children, exploitation of workers, animal cruelty, damage to the environment and the global domination of corporations over our lives."

* Buy Nothing Day, on the day after Thanksgiving (Nov. 24, 2000), "forces us to think about the "shop-till-you-drop" imperative and its effects on the rest of the world. On Buy Nothing Day enjoy a break from the shopping frenzy. Relish your power as a consumer to change the economic environment."

* Car Free Day, which was on September 21, 2000 and is held annually, aims to "tell the drivers, the road construction companies, the oil companies, the car manufacturers, the world's governments and ministries, and banking institutions that enough is enough!" (See also: carfree.com.)

* Movies such as "American Beauty", "Fight Club", and "the Matrix" (some of the better movies in the last decade) have attacked supposedly ideal American values and society and have shown the underlying unhappiness with the system that is in many people's lives.

* Turn Off The TV Week from April 22-28, "to encourage more people to create their own brand of entertainment -- a powerful gesture of consumer sovereignty. The broader goal is to draw attention to the fact that a handful of megacorporations now control the global information superstructure and routinely censor opinions that challenge their interests and profitability."

* Movements to limit the out-of-control corporate power in California, Colorado, Pennsylvania, Oregon, and a coalition of nine Midwestern U.S. states. Such movements include efforts to revoke corporate charters if they commit three regulation violations or to force corporations to justify their charters every 10 years.

Rejection of corporate and capitalist dominance is international, too

Indications of dissatisfaction with the New World Order and the dominance of corporations over everyday people can be seen all over the world. I can think of a few examples just off the top of my head, but there are many more.

* Wealth gap: The world's 225 richest people have a combined wealth equal to the combined annual income of the world's 2.5 billion poorest people. A 4 percent levy on their wealth would provide adequate food, safe water and sanitation, basic education, basic health care and reproductive health care for all those in the developing countries.

* Basic needs: According to the United Nations, 2.6 billion people have no access to sanitation, 2 billion have no electricity and 100 million are homeless.

* Bolivia: More than 300,000 trade unionists and environmentalists held a general strike to protest IMF imposed structural adjustment and World Bank water privatization policies that have given public resources away to corporations. Recently, too, we've seen revolting workers, including coca growers, teachers and rural agriculturists in Bolivia.

* Indonesia: Indigenous people of the annexed West Papua have been defending themselves against the Indonesian army and the country's exploitation and ecological destruction of their land and people. The Free West Papua movement's statements mirror many other peoples across the globe:

"The struggle to free W. Papua is not to take away one government and replace it with a new government. We do not want to administer ourselves the capitalist 'profit making'. It is the struggle between modern society and tribal people. We have our common enemy, and we need to work together, throughout the world to make it disappear from this planet earth. We can only make it happen if we are united. The unity of all people in this world will make it happen. Yi Wa O!"

About 300,000 Papuans have lost their lives because of Indonesian invasion and occupation since 1963.

* Korea: Nearly two hundred people's organisations, social movements, and civil society organisations in Korea, Asia and Europe are organizing actions on Oct. 20, 2000 against the Asia Europe Summit Meeting, a meeting of the heads of states of 15 European nations and 10 Asian countries. The counter-globalization organizations are putting together a conference with the theme of "People's Action and Solidarity Challenging Globalisation".

* Greece: Thousands of people have recently waged several protests against war, educational reform, police brutality and authoritarianism.

* France: In 1995, millions of French workers rejected the brand of American corporate-controlled government that has been forced on many countries globally. Government and private-sector employees went on strikes that crippled the government and forced at least minimal concessions to their demands. The workers were protesting the conservative government's "reforms" to the social security system, cutting aid to poor families, reducing benefits to government workers, and imposing new taxes in order to attract foreign capital and rejuvenate the economy.